Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hamel v. Simmons et al
as 4:2018cv40012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Richard Hamel
Defendant:
Jennifer A Simmons, Mark T Esper and James M Mattis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept.
as 17-181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Hamel, Officer, Individually and as a Police Officer and Member of the Waterbury Police Department, Jason Lanoie, Officer, Individually and as a Police Officer and Member of the Waterbury Police Department, Max Torres, Officer, Individually and as a Police Officer and Member of the Waterbury Police Department and others
Defendant:
City of Waterbury Police Department, Tim Jameson, Officer, Individually and as a Police Officer and Member of the Waterbury Police Department, Robert Liquindoli, Officer, Individually and as a Police Officer and Member of the Waterbury Police Department and others
Owens v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv01405
Plaintiff:
Andrew Owens
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of Waterbury, Gary Angon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMEL v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2015cv03870
Plaintiff:
GORDON RICHARD HAMEL
Defendant:
MARK J. SHAVER, LORETTA E. LYNCH and THOMAS E. BRENDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, Richard Hamel, Jason Lanore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 3:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, Richard Hamel, Jason Lanore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamel v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv01863
Plaintiff:
Richard Hamel
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
