Stergue v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Kathryn Ferris Stergue
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2013cv00025
Filed: January 4, 2013
Court: Connecticut District Court
Office: New Haven Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Donna F. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:0405dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 19, 2016 28 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER approving and adopting 22 Recommended Ruling; denying 20 Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner; granting 21 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner. Please see attached Ruling and Order. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/19/16. (Samuels, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stergue v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Ferris Stergue
Represented By: Ivan Michael Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?