Gulley v. Hall et al
| Chaz O. Gulley |
| Ogando, Mahoney and Rose Walker |
| 3:2015cv00962 |
| June 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER. The Motion 33 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all claims against defendants Rosalee Walker and Lieutenant Ogando and as to the claim against defendant Mahoney involving the use of a chemical agent on May 6, 2015. The Motion is DENIED a s to the claim of excessive force involving the use of a chemical agent by defendant Lieutenant Mahoney on May 11, 2015.The Court refers this case to the Honorable Donna F. Martinez for mediation. The clerk is instructed to appoint pro bono counsel for the plaintiff solely for the purpose of the mediation. The joint trial memorandum is due 60 days from any unsuccessful conclusion of the mediation.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/21/17. (Tegeler, D.)
|
|
Filing
7
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. As set forth herein, the claims against defendants Hall and Perry are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The case will proceed on the claim for use of excessive force against defendants Mahoney, Ogando, and Walker. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/29/15. (Bradley, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
