Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Harnage v. Gallagher et al
as 3:2025cv01487
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
Colleen Gallagher, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv10165
Plaintiff:
ROSE WALKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mitchell v. Schauer et al
as 3:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Sarah Schauer, Rose Walker, Marybeth Moure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Theresa Rose Walker
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Miller v. Furtick et al
as 3:2021cv00648
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Tawana Furtick, Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Lupis et al
as 3:2021cv00273
Defendant:
Nicole Anker, Monica Farinella, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Cunningham, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Lupis et al
as 3:2020cv01754
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Gwen Doe, Ian Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosby v. McDonald et al
as 3:2020cv00432
Plaintiff:
Howard Cosby
Defendant:
McDonald, Chena McPhearson, Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
