Cooke v. Deschaine et al
Ian Cooke |
Kevin Deschaine, Hogan, Garcia, Lauren Powers, Jon Brighthaupt, Kim Weir, Christine M. Whidden, Nancy Kase-O'Brasky, Leo Arnone and Scott Semple |
3:2016cv00138 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Fairfield |
Stefan R. Underhill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER denying 68 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 7/18/2019. (Kaas, E.) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Reconsideration, but denying the requested relief and affirming the 26 Initial Review Order in all respects; granting 29 Motion for Clarification; denying 34 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying without prejudice 37 Motion for Sanctions; denying without prejudice 38 Motion for Default Judgment; denying without prejudice 39 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/28/2017. (Landman, M) |
Filing 26 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Discovery due by 7/16/2017; Dispositive Motions due by 8/15/2017. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/15/2016. (Landman, M) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration; denying as moot 22 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus; granting 23 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/14/2016. (Landman, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/28/2016. (Landman, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.