Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dohme v. Semple et al
as 3:2026cv01037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dohme
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzureuda, Carol Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Semple et al
as 3:2026cv01019
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kennedy
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurade, Carol Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Semple
as 26-892
Plaintiff:
BARRY J. ARPIN
Defendant:
Captain WATSON, in their individual capacities, Lieutenant EBERLE, in their individual capacities, Lieutenant BOYD, in their individual capacities and others
Coarts v. Semple et al
as 3:2025cv01520
Plaintiff:
Semaj Coarts
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Dzurenda, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turoczi et al v. Osborn C.I. et al
as 3:2025cv01409
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi and Roberto Viera
Defendant:
Osborn C.I. and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Semple et al
as 3:2025cv01211
Plaintiff:
Anthony Perry
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Leo Arnone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2025cv00938
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzureuoa, Cheryl Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinoli v. Semple et al
as 3:2025cv00886
Plaintiff:
Vincent Martinoli
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cheryl Cepelak, James Dzuran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferraro v. Semple et al
as 3:2025cv00884
Plaintiff:
Carl Ferraro
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Cheryl Cepelak, James Dzuran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cristillo et al
as 3:2025cv00854
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Harris
Defendant:
Cristillo, State of CT, D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
