Harnage v. Brennan et al
Plaintiff: James A. Harnage
Defendant: Janine Brennan, Wu, Laura and Jane Does
Case Number: 3:2016cv01659
Filed: October 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New London
Presiding Judge: Alvin W. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 242 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/28/2020. (Clough, M.)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, the Court GRANTS, in part, and DENIES, in part, plaintiff's 51 MOTION to Compel Responses, MOTION for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Re: Plaintiffs Second Request for P roduction Directed to Brennan and plaintiff's 53 MOTION to Compel Responses, MOTION for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Re: Plaintiff's First Request for Production Directed to Janine Brennan, Dr. Wu, and Nurse Laura.T he parties are hereby ORDERED to file their joint trial memorandum, in accordance with Judge Thompson's April 9, 2018, order (Doc. # 43 ), on or before the close of business on November 2, 2018.The Court will accept no further discovery briefing. Discovery is closed. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/30/2018. (Katz, S.)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling, plaintiff's 44 MOTION to Compel Responses to and For Sanctions For Failure to Comply with Discovery re: Plaintiff's Interrogatories Directed to Dr. Wu is GRANTED, in part, and DE NIED, in part, and plaintiff's 45 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and MOTION for Modification of Scheduling Order is GRANTED, in part, for the limited purpose of completing the discovery ordered in this Ruling. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/9/2018. (Katz, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harnage v. Brennan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James A. Harnage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janine Brennan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?