Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Cano
as 3:2026cv02365
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laura Y. Cano
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00341
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Stephens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kennedy v. Ayars et al
as 6:2026cv01926
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Kennedy
Defendant:
Laura Ayars, Catriona McCracken and Danielle Willey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2026cv03392
Plaintiff:
Laura Rand
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sabol, et al. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., et al.
as 26-6026
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN SABOL, SAMANTHIA RUSSELL, CHELCIE BLAKE and others
Defendant:
PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., a California Corporation and PAYPAL, INC., a California Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26362
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gianne et al v. The Campbell's Company
as 3:2026cv05306
Plaintiff:
Natalie Gianne and Laura Willis Albrigo
Defendant:
The Campbell's Company doing business as Kettle Brand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
