Shand v. Chapalaine et al
| Christopher Shand |
| Chapalaine, Hines, Gwaddarama, Rivera, Mancini, Raines and John Does |
| 3:2017cv01947 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Janet C. Hall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: All claims against Chapdelaine, Hines, and Guadarrama are dismissed. Shands Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims are dismissed. Shands Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force and deliberate indifference to medical needs an d state law assault and battery claims may proceed against Rivera, Raines, Mancini, and Does 14 in their individual capacities for damages. The Clerk shall verify the current work addresses for Rivera, Raines, and Mancini with the Department of Corre ction Office of Legal Affairs, mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the Complaint to each defendant at the confirmed address within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the Court on the status of the waiver reque st on the thirty-fifth (35) day after mailing. If a defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in person service by the U.S. Marshal Service on him or her, and the defendant shall be required to pay the costs of such service in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Because Shand has not identified John Does 14 by name, the Clerk is not able to serve a copy of the Complaint on those defendants in their individual capacities. Shand must, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Order, conduct discovery and file a notice indicating the first and last name of those four defendants. If Shand files the notice, the court will direct the Clerk to effect service of the Complaint on those defendants in the ir individual capacities. If Shand fails to identify those defendants within the time specified, his claim against them will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Rivera, Raines, Mancini, and Does 14 (if identified) shall file their response to the Complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. They may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules. Discovery due by 7/3/2018 Dispositive Motions due by 8/3/2018 Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/2/2018.(Lewis, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
