Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Depop, Inc.
as 1:2026cv11297
Plaintiff:
Javier Rivera
Defendant:
Depop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01991
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIVERA v. WALMART INC. et al
as 1:2026cv12005
Plaintiff:
LILLIAM RIVERA
Defendant:
WALMART INC, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCount McClanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Washington v. Fang et al
as 3:2026cv00325
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. FANG et al
as 1:2026cv00939
Plaintiff:
LEO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
VANESSA FANG, JASMINE LECONT MCCLANAHAN, ROWAN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Howard et al
as 1:2026cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Sgt. William Howard, LT Audrey Evans, LT. Heather Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
