Riddick v. Semple et al
| Jerome Riddick |
| Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Nicole Prior, Gregorio Robles, Caron and Scanning Program - Northern |
| 3:2018cv00408 |
| March 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER denying as moot 18 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 19 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 20 Motion to Withdraw. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/18/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
16
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice to filing an amended complaint within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/7/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Disqualify Judge for Personal Bias or Prejudice. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/25/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER regarding future filings. To the extent Riddick wishes to request court action in future filings, he is hereby ORDERED to label such filings as motions, not as proposed orders. To the extent Riddick wishes to file the same document in multiple cases, he is hereby ORDERED to file separate documents in each case, each such document bearing only the caption of that case. Riddick is directed to consult the entire order attached to this docket entry for more details. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/18/2018. (Schneider, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
