Myers v. Semple et al
Kevin A. Myers, Jr. |
Scott Semple, William Mulligan, Angel Quiros, Jessica A. Bennett, Lizon, Richardson, S. Ocasio and Maldonado |
3:2018cv00505 |
March 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Hartford |
Janet C. Hall |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 35 Motion for Default Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. See attached order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 10/21/2019. (Gould, K.) |
Filing 9 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: The claims against all of the defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED pursuant to section 1915A(b). The First Amendment claim, the request for injunctive relief, and the claims against defendants Semple, Mulligan, and Bennett in their individual capacities are also DISMISSED. The Eighth Amendment conditions claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Myers may refile his Eighth Amendment claim if he can identify a proper defendant and state facts alleging that he ex hausted his administrative remedies on this claim prior to March 26, 2018. The case will proceed on the procedural due process and false accusation claims for damages against defendants Richardson, Quiros, Lizon, Ocasio, and Maldonado in their individual capacities. Discovery due by 2/21/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 3/23/2019 Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/23/2018.(Lewis, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.