Moore v. Parsons et al
Terrance Moore |
Parsons, Titus, Melendez and Prior |
3:2018cv00507 |
March 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Hartford |
Charles S. Haight |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (see attached). With consent of both parties and in the interest of judicial economy, the Court will exercise its discretion to bifurcate the proceedings. The parties are instructed to first proceed with discovery and motion pr actice on the issue of administrative exhaustion before addressing the other issues, claims, and defenses in the case. Specifically, the parties should proceed in accordance with the following modified schedule. All discovery concerning the limited issue of Plaintiff's administrative exhaustion shall be completed by January 22, 2018. Defendants shall file any motion for summary judgment concerning Plaintiff's administrative exhaustion by February 22, 2019, and Plaintiff shall file his response to such motion by April 19, 2019. If so advised, Defendants shall file reply papers by April 26, 2019. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 10/16/2018. (Ghosh, R.) |
Filing 6 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER (see attached). Upon the Court's review of Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the case may proceed only on the following federal claims: Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force against Parsons, Melendez, and Prior; Eighth Amendment claim for failure to intervene against Titus, Melendez, and Prior; and First Amendment retaliation claim against Parsons. Plaintiff's state law claims of assault and battery may proceed against Parsons, Mel endez, and Prior; and Plaintiff's state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress may proceed against Parsons, Titus, Melendez, and Prior. All claims are permitted to proceed against the defendant solely in his individual capacity for money damages. All other claims are DISMISSED. All claims against Defendants Vargas, Sanchez, Robles, Faneuff, and Molden are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 4/19/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.