Gillums v. Semple et al
Plaintiff: Kirk Kapeace Gillums
Defendant: Scott Semple, Department of Corrections, Hannah and Bridgeport Correctional Center
Case Number: 3:2018cv00947
Filed: June 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Fairfield
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Haight
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER (see attached). For the reasons discussed in the attached Order, the instant action is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on January 3, 2019. (Ghosh, R.)
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER ON AMENDED COMPLAINT (see attached). Consistent with the attached Order, Plaintiff's claim alleging denial of access to the courts pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 will proceed against Defendants in their official capacitie s for injunctive relief. Plaintiff's claim alleging a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Any request for interim injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 8/3/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.)
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER (see attached) dismissing Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, without prejudice to filing an amended complaint asserting 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims related to Plaintiff's access to the courts and equal protection, in a ccordance with the attached Initial Review Order. If no amended complaint is filed on or before August 13, 2018, the Clerk is directed to close the case and enter judgment for Defendants. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 7/12/2018. (Kaczmarek, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gillums v. Semple et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirk Kapeace Gillums
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Semple
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hannah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgeport Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?