DeAngelis v. Wright et al
| Jeffery DeAngelis |
| Connecticut Department of Corrections, Kevin Roy, Scott Semple, Gary Wright and Wilcox |
| 3:2018cv01352 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for to Commence Service Order by Jeffery DeAngelis. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/13/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 08/13/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/13/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS - Filing fee received from Jeffrey DeAngelis: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXH00014456 (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Connecticut Department of Corrections, Kevin Roy, Scott Semple, Wilcox, Gary Wright, filed by Jeffery DeAngelis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
