Laudano v. Semple et al
Harry Laudano |
Department of Correction, Mary Ellen Castro, Penny Hall, Monica Farinella, Ricardo Ruiz, Scott Semple and Heidi Greene |
3:2018cv01919 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alfred V Covello |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 1/3/2019.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 12/4/2018. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 4 Prisoner E - Filing Standing Order Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/26/2018. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 11/26/2018. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Harry Laudano. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against Mary Ellen Castro, Department of Corrections, Monica Farinella, Heidi Greene, Penny Hall, Ricardo Ruiz, Scott Semple, filed by Harry Laudano. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.