Awad v. Semple et al
Omar Awad |
Anthony Corcella, Scott Semple, Seplack, Daniell Borges and David Egan |
3:2018cv02008 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Omar Awad (Payton, R.) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Omar Awad.Responses due by 1/23/2019 (Payton, R.) |
Filing 7 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Although, you have sworn under penalty of perjury that the responses in the IFP application are truthful, the responses in question 6 do not accurately reflect the deposits shown on your Inmate Account Statement. Please file a new IFP application. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 1/7/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 12/18/2018.(Payton, R.) |
|
|
|
Filing 3 PRISCS - MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Omar Awad. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 12/11/2018 to edit text, deleted referral judge (Fazekas, J.). |
Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Omar Awad. J.) Modified on 12/11/2018 to edit text, deleted referral judge (Fazekas, J.). |
Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Daniell Borges, Anthony Corcella, David Egan, Scott Semple, Seplack, filed by Omar Awad.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.