Green v. Wright et al
| Courtney Green |
| Scott Semple and Gary Wright |
| 3:2019cv00052 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Charles S Haight |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (see attached). Accordingly, on or before April 8, 2019, the respondents must file their response to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, stating (1) why the relief prayed for in the Petition should not be granted, and (2) the effect, if any, of the attached court authority on this case. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on 03/04/2019. (Attachments: #1 Breton v Commissioner of Correction) (Chen, C.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 1/10/2019.(Pipech, L.)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/10/2019.(Pipech, L.)
|
| Filing 1 PRISCS - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Courtney Green. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Green v. Commissioner of Correction, #3 Petition for Certification, #4 Envelope)(Pipech, L.) |
| PRISCS - Filing fee received from State of CT Dept of Corr for Courtney Green: $ 5.00, receipt number CTXH00015101. (Pipech, L.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
