St. Louis v. Wu et al
| Chadwick J. St. Louis |
| Valletta, Mary Ellen Castro, Johnny Wu, Anthony Corcella, Tawanna Furtick, Cheryl Spano-Lonis, Kevin McChrystal, Scott Semple, Syed Johar Naqvi, Kathleen Maurer, William Mulligan, Omprakash Pillai and Danielle Borges |
| 3:2019cv00320 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received from Chadwick J. St. Louis: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXB00010103 (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 5 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. You must submit the filing fee of $400.00 or a Prisoner's IFP application which is being sent to you via U.S. mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 4/3/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 3/13/2019.(Payton, R.) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/5/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/5/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/5/2019.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Chadwick J. St. Louis.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
