Spicer v. Burden et al
Eddie Spicer |
John Doe, Town of Stratford, Jarrett, Arbelo III, Vaughn, Lecardo, Burden and Arbelo, III |
3:2019cv01472 |
September 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/13/2019.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/13/2019. (Freberg, B) |
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/26/2019. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard C Buturla on behalf of Arbelo, III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn (Buturla, Richard) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Eddie Spicer. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Arbelo, III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn.(Buturla, Richard) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time until October 31, 2019 to File an Answer to the Complaint or Motion To Dismiss Complaint #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/7/2019. (Freberg, B) |
Answer deadline updated for Arbelo, III to 10/31/2019; Burden to 10/31/2019; John Doe to 10/31/2019; Jarrett to 10/31/2019; Lecardo to 10/31/2019; Town of Stratford to 10/31/2019; Vaughn to 10/31/2019. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Buturla on behalf of Arbelo, III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn (Buturla, Richard) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time until October 31, 2019 to File an Answer to the Complaint or Motion To Dismiss Complaint #1 Complaint by Arbelo, III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn. (Holcomb, Warren) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren L. Holcomb on behalf of Arbelo, III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn (Holcomb, Warren) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Eddie Spicer, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 9/19/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/19/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/19/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/18/2019 Discovery due by 3/20/2020 Dispositive Motions due by 4/24/2020 Signed by Clerk on 9/19/2019. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arbelo III, Burden, John Doe, Jarrett, Lecardo, Town of Stratford, Vaughn, filed by Eddie Spicer. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing fee received from Eddie Spicer: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXB00010575. (Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.