Cases 1 - 10 of 1,571
Neal v. Jackson et al
as 1:2025cv00141
Plaintiff:
Dion Mario Neal
Defendant:
Kathy King Jackson, Angel Myers McIllrath, Kristen Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JARRETT v. HUDSON et al
as 2:2025cv04203
Plaintiff:
SONIA JARRETT
Defendant:
DUANE EDWARD HUDSON, HUDSON TRUCKING, LLC and HUDSON TRANSPORT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sylvester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2025cv06252
Plaintiff:
Jarrett A Sylvester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mark White v. Marvin Mosley, et al
as 25-1448
Plaintiff:
MARK EARL WHITE
Defendant:
MARVIN MOSELY, SERGEANT STEVEN GARROW, SIRENA LANDFAIR and others
CARLTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2025cv01359
Plaintiff:
JARRETT CARLTON and SYDNEY CARLTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Jacqueline Agee, et al v. Paige Hickenbottom, et al
as 25-1737
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE J. AGEE and JOHN J. AGEE, originally a minor filed by and through his legal guardian JACQUELINE J. AGEE
Defendant:
PAIGE N. HICKENBOTTOM, SAMUEL A. JACOBS, JARRETT A. STICKLE and others
BAKER v. WEST
as 1:2025cv00289
Plaintiff:
JARRETT RAYSHAWN BAKER
Defendant:
CARLA WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Chief Holland et al
as 1:2025cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael L Rogers
Defendant:
Chief Holland, Lt. Watson, Sgt Podwys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOWELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2025cv00931
Plaintiff:
BERNADINE LOWELL, RAYMOND LOWELL, AMIRAH GOODE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Jarrett v. Monro, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00278
Plaintiff:
George Jarrett
Defendant:
Monro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
