Roman v. Hartford Auto Group, Inc. et al
Celio Roman |
Hartford Auto Group, Inc., Credit Acceptance Corporation and Hartford Auto Group, Inc. doing business as MAC Mitsubishi |
3:2020cv00120 |
January 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. § 1601 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 19 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay All Proceedings in This Action until April 17, 2020 by Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Canter, Nelson) |
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/27/2020 (Perez, J.) |
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Hartford Auto Group, Inc. to 5/1/2020. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time until May 1, 2020 Reply to Complaint by Hartford Auto Group, Inc.. (Armon, Regina) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Regina P Armon on behalf of Hartford Auto Group, Inc. (Armon, Regina) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan Lorenz Mahoney on behalf of Celio Roman (Mahoney, Brendan) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) for failure to plead as to Hartford Auto Group, Inc. by Celio Roman. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay All Proceedings in This Action filed by Celio Roman. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Celio Roman, #2 Order Re: Criscione v. Atlantic Motors, et al)(Blinn, Daniel) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Canter, Nelson) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and, MOTION to Stay All Proceedings in This Action by Credit Acceptance Corporation.Responses due by 3/13/2020 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Contract, #3 Exhibit B - E-Signature Declaration, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Canter, Nelson) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Celio Roman. Hartford Auto Group, Inc. served on 2/4/2020, answer due 2/25/2020. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Celio Roman. Credit Acceptance Corporation served on 1/31/2020, answer due 2/21/2020. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Hartford Auto Group, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel S. Blinn* *Consumer Law Group* *35 Cold Spring Rd., Suite 512* *Rocky Hill, CT 06067*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Credit Acceptance Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel S. Blinn* *Consumer Law Group* *35 Cold Spring Rd., Suite 512* *Rocky Hill, CT 06067*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Celio Roman, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 01/29/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credit Acceptance Corporation, Hartford Auto Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5659109.), filed by Celio Roman.(Blinn, Daniel) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Hartford Auto Group, Inc.. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Blinn, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.