Rodriguez v. McCormick et al
Plaintiff: Felix Rodriguez
Defendant: G. Washington, N. McCormick, T. Tralli, R. Ruiz, K. McCrystal and G. Washinton
Case Number: 3:2020cv01019
Filed: July 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L Bryant
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER directing the sealing of Plaintiff's [14-1] Exhibit A in accordance with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e)(3). This order is based on the Court's finding that the materials to be sealed contain confidential information concerning Plaintiff's medical condition. See Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA); D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 5(e)(3) ("A statute mandating or permitting the non-disclosure of a class of documents (e.g., personnel files, health care records, or records of administrative proceedings) provides sufficient authority to support an order sealing such documents.") (emphasis added). The confidentiality of medical records outweighs the public's right to know. See Northrop v. Carucci, No. 3:04-cv-00103 (RNC), 2007 WL 685173, at *3 (D. Conn. Mar. 5, 2007) ("[F]ederal law treats medical records as confidential.") (citing HIPAA). The Clerk is directed to seal [14-1] Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 9/15/2020. (Nault, James)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against N. McCormick, T. Tralli, G. Washington, K. McCrystal, R. Ruiz, filed by Felix Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against N. McCormick, T. Tralli, G. Washinton, filed by Felix Rodriguez. (Velez, F.) Modified on 8/17/2020 to correct file date (Velez, F.).
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's #1 Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(A). The Clerk is directed to docket the attached Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 8/14/2020. (Nault, James)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Amend Plaintiff's #1 Complaint, by Felix Rodriguez. Responses due by 9/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice to re-filing at the appropriate time. A court "may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel." 42 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). However, civil litigants do not have a constitutional right to the appointment of counsel. See Leftridge v. Conn. State Trooper Officer No. 1283, 640 F.3d 62, 6869 (2d Cir. 2011) ("A party has no constitutionally guaranteed right to the assistance of counsel in a civil case.") (citation omitted). In considering whether to appoint pro bono counsel for an indigent litigant, a district court must "first determine whether the indigent's position seems likely to be of substance." See Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61 (2d Cir. 1986); see also Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 171 (2d Cir. 1989)("counsel is often unwarranted where the [litigant's] chances of success are extremely slim."). At this juncture, Plaintiff's #4 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice as the Court has yet to consider the plausibility of Plaintiff's claims under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. The Plaintiff may refile his motion for appointment of counsel after this Court has determined whether Plaintiff's claims may proceed beyond initial review. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/28/2020. (Nault, James)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litgation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 7/27/20. (Payton, R.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Felix Rodriguez. Corrected document #2 . (Velez, F.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/21/2020. (Velez, F.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/21/2020. (Velez, F.) Modified on 7/21/2020 to correct typo (Velez, F.).
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/21/2020. (Velez, F.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISCS -- MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Felix Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Velez, F.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISCS -- Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Felix Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR: PRISCS -- MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, by Felix Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.) Modified on 7/27/2020 to indicate entererd in error (Velez, F.).
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against N. McCormick, T. Tralli, G. Washinton, filed by Felix Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.) Modified on 8/17/2020 to correct typo (Velez, F.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. McCormick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Tralli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. McCrystal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Washinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felix Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?