Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mark Brentley, Jr. v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 23-3203
Plaintiff:
MARK BRENTLEY, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, MIKE GABLE, WILLIAM PEDUTO and others
Rodriguez v. McCormick et al
as 3:2021cv01071
Plaintiff:
Felix Rodriguez
Defendant:
N. McCormick, D. Long, J. Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaquez v. McCormick et al
as 3:2020cv01544
Defendant:
Rivera, N. McCormick, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. McCormick et al
as 3:2020cv01019
Defendant:
G. Washington, N. McCormick, T. Tralli and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28934
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK N MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rooks v. Santiago et al
as 3:2020cv00299
Defendant:
McNeil, A. Hannah, Snowden and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauwens et al v. Spaan Tech, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00861
Plaintiff:
David Witz, Kenneth J. Bauwens, Donald Finn and others
Defendant:
Spaan Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
PRUITT et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv21185
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. (F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CYNTHIA N. MCCORMICK and LOIS PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauwens et al v. STS Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv07445
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Shea, Kenneth J. Bauwens, I. Steven Diamond and others
Defendant:
STS Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Bauwens et al v. Wigdahl Electric Company
as 1:2018cv04834
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Shea, Kenneth J. Bauwens, I. Steven Diamond and others
Defendant:
Wigdahl Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
