Carolina v. Feder et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone D. Carolina
Defendant: Martin, Daily, Ingrid Feder, Vallero, Stepheny, Malissa and Jusseaume
Case Number: 3:2021cv00367
Filed: March 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2021 Reset Deadline: Dismissal due by 6/15/2021 (Barry, Donna)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. On March 17, I denied without prejudice Carolina's motion to proceed in forma pauperis because his motion did not "contain enough information to allow me to conclude that he cannot pay the standard $402 civil case filing fee." Order, Doc. No. 6. I told Carolina that he "may be able to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter, but he must submit a motion with more detailed and accurate statements about both his income and expenditures." Id. To date, Carolina has not filed a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. I remind Carolina that, to proceed with this case, he must either pay the civil filing fee or re-file his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If he does not do so sometime before June 15, 2021 -- or provide a reason why he has not -- I will be likely to dismiss this case either for failure to prosecute and/or for a failure to effect service in a timely manner pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/21/2021. (Rosenberg, J.)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Carolina's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Carolina's motion does not contain enough information to allow me to conclude that he cannot pay the standard $402 civil case filing fee. For instance, according to Carolina's motion, he has both $0 in income and $0 in obligations. Although Carolina indicates that he is unemployed and receives government benefits, he does not explain what benefits and in what amounts. In addition, Carolina writes that he spends $0 per month on food, clothing, and other necessary expenditures. Carolina may be able to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter, but he must submit a motion with more detailed and accurate statements about both his income and expenditures. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/19/2021. (Rosenberg, J.)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/16/2021. Discovery due by 9/16/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 10/21/2021. Signed by Clerk on 03/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
March 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone D. Carolina. (Fazekas, J.)
March 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daily, Ingrid Feder, Jusseaume, Malissa, Martin, Stepheny, Vallero, filed by Tyrone D. Carolina. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carolina v. Feder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daily
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ingrid Feder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vallero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stepheny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Malissa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jusseaume
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone D. Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?