Sentementes v. Lamont
| Thomas Sentementes |
| Ned Lamont, Patterson, Pasqualina Bastone, Daniel Sentementes, Sean Wanat, Susan Winters, John Wanat, Brian Moynihan, Vadas and Quinn |
| 3:2021cv00453 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Patterson waiver sent on 5/26/2021, answer due 7/25/2021 filed by Patterson. (Allen, Patrick) |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Vadas waiver sent on 5/26/2021, answer due 7/25/2021 filed by Vadas. (Allen, Patrick) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Quinn waiver sent on 5/26/2021, answer due 7/25/2021 filed by Quinn. (Allen, Patrick) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick D Allen on behalf of Patterson, Quinn, Vadas (Allen, Patrick) |
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Pasqualina Bastone waiver sent on 4/26/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to John Wanat waiver sent on 4/26/2021, answer due 6/25/2021 filed by John Wanat. (Esty, Miles) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Miles David Newman Esty on behalf of John Wanat (Esty, Miles) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Incorporate the Cause of Action for Malicious Prosecution by Thomas Sentementes.Responses due by 6/10/2021 (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 13
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, plaintiff's motion [ECF No. 10] is DENIED without prejudice. In addition, the 12 order directing defendants to respond to plaintiff's #10 motion is VACATED.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/27/2021. (Super, John)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Sentementes filed a motion for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 10.) Defendants shall respond to the motion no later than May 23, 2021. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/26/2021. (Super, John)
|
| Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 5/23/2021 (Johnson, D.) |
| REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Quinn, Vadas, Patterson, Bastone, Sean Wanat, and John Wanat on 04/26/2021. Waiver of Service due by 5/31/2021 (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE to the Court by Thomas Sentementes re #8 Order (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Thomas Sentementes. Responses due by 5/14/2021 (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 9
Entered in Error: Standing Order re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/23/2021. (Peterson, M) Modified on 4/23/2021 (Peterson, M).
|
| Docket Entry Correction re #9 Order was entered in error. Please disregard. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the Clerk is directed to add Sergeant Quinn, Officer Vadas, and Officer Patterson of the Redding Police Department; and private citizens John Wanat, Sean Wanat, Pasqualina Bastone, Daniel Sentementes, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, and Susan Winters as defendants in this case.All claims against Governor Lamont and the State of Connecticut; the First and Fourteenth Amendment claims and the defamation and slander claims against defendants Quinn, Vadas, and Patterson are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims against defendants Moynihan and Sentementes.The case will proceed on the federal claim for false arrest against defendants Quinn, Vadas, and Patterson in their individual capacities; the negligence, defamation, and slander claims against defendants Bastone, Winters, Sean Wanat, and John Wanat; and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against defendants Quinn, Vadas, Patterson, Bastone, Winters, Sean Wanat, and John Wanat.The Court enters the following additional orders.(1) The Clerk shall mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the Complaint and this Order to defendants Quinn, Vadas, and Patterson at the Redding Police Department, 96 Hill Road, Redding, CT 06875 and to defendants Bastone, Sean Wanat, and John Wanat at the addresses provided in the handwritten complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the court on the status of the waiver request on the thirty-fifth day after mailing. If the any defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on the defendant in his or her individual capacity and the defendant shall be required to pay the cost of such service.(2) The Clerk shall send the plaintiff a copy of this Order.(3) The defendants shall file their responses to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the waiver forms are sent. If they choose to file answers, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claim recited above. They also may include all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules.(4) Discovery, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, shall be completed within seven months (210 days) from the date of this order. Discovery requests need not be filed with the court.(5) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed within eight months (240 days) from the date of this order.(6) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a nonmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection.(7) If the plaintiff changes his address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Court Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that he MUST notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the case. The plaintiff must give notice of a new address even if he is incarcerated. The plaintiff should write PLEASE NOTE MY NEW ADDRESS on the notice. It is not enough to just put the new address on a letter without indicating that it is a new address. If the plaintiff has more than one pending case, he should indicate all the case numbers in the notification of change of address. The plaintiff should also notify the defendants or the attorney for the defendants of his new address. (8) The plaintiff shall utilize the Prisoner Efiling Program when filing documents with the court. The plaintiff is advised that the Program may be used only to file documents with the court. As local court rules provide that discovery requests are not filed with the court, discovery requests must be served on defendants counsel by regular mail. In addition, the plaintiff must serve copies of all documents by regular mail on any defendant who does not participate in electronic filing.(9) The Clerk cannot effect service on defendant Winters without a service address. The plaintiff shall obtain this address and provide it to the court within thirty days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of all claims against defendant Winters. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/20/2021. (Super, John)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of you case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/9/21. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 04/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 04/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 04/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Thomas Sentementes. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas Sentementes. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Ned Lamont, filed by Thomas Sentementes.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
