Diaz v. Metro-North Railroad Company
| Javier Diaz |
| Metro-North Railroad Company |
| 3:2021cv00524 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna Cutler on behalf of Metro-North Railroad Company (Cutler, Jenna) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Beck S. Fineman on behalf of Metro-North Railroad Company (Fineman, Beck) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Metro-North Railroad Company waiver sent on 4/16/2021, answer due 6/15/2021 filed by Javier Diaz. (Perry, Scott) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metro-North Railroad Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Scott E. Perry* *Cahill & Perry, P.C.* *43 Trumbull St.* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel initiating this action is responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint, #3 Electronic Filing Order, and #5 Order Re: Chambers Practices. Signed by Clerk on 4/16/2021. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/15/2021. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/15/2021. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/15/2021. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/14/2021. Discovery due by 10/15/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 11/19/2021. Signed by Clerk on 4/15/2021. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro-North Railroad Company ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6472860.), filed by Javier Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Civil Cover Sheet)(Perry, Scott) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Metro-North Railroad Company. (Perry, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diaz v. Metro-North Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metro-North Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Jenna Cutler |
| Represented By: | Beck S. Fineman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Javier Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Perry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
