Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Leal v. City Of Laredo et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
David Leal, II
Defendant:
City Of Laredo, James Cantu, Jacqueline Davalos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Diaz-De La Cruz
as 23-5055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODRIGO JAVIER DIAZ-DE LA CRUZ, AKA Jose T. Gonzalez
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11803
Plaintiff:
CARLOS JAVIER DIAZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zamora et al v. JGL Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv05739
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Castillo Zamora, Jose Edwin Mendez and Javier Diaz Plaza
Defendant:
JGL Restaurant Corp. d/b/a Italian Village Pizza and Jose Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gonzalez et al v. Raguboy Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03607
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Alvarez Gonzalez, Javier Diaz Plaza and Erick Alvarez
Defendant:
Raguboy Corp. d/b/a Supper Restaurant, Frank Prisinzano and Anis Oueslati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
USA v. Diaz Martinez
as 22-20074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Francisco Javier Diaz Martinez
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04734
Plaintiff:
JAVIER DIAZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz Castro v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Javier Diaz Castro
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepulveda v. City of Doral et al
as 1:2021cv23267
Plaintiff:
Victor Sepulveda
Defendant:
City of Doral, Officer Omar Felipe, Officer Alberto Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Rodarte v. Garland
as 21-658
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER DIAZ-RODARTE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
