Quigley v. Williams et al
| Jay Quigley |
| Williams, Daniels, John Doe, Thibodeau, Martin, Reynoso, Czikowsky, Allison Hill, Janine M. Brennan and Gerald G. Gagne |
| 3:2021cv01158 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 10/15/2021.(Hushin, Z.)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT filed by Jay Quigley. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing fee received from State of Connecticut DOC FBO Jason Quigley: $402, receipt number CTXH00018316. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 8/30/2021. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 8/30/2021. (Agati, Kathryn)
|
| Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against Janine M. Brennan, Czikowsky, Daniels, John Doe(C/O, #2, Evans, sued in their Individual Capacity ), John Doe(C/O, #1, Evans, sued in their Individual Capacity ), Gerald G. Gagne, Allison Hill, Martin, Reynoso, Thibodeau, Williams, filed by Jay Quigley. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (Agati, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
