Azukas v. Semple et al
| Anthony Azukas |
| Scott Semple, Scott Erfe, Danby, Ricardo Ruiz, Kristen Donohue-Gonzalez and Shadane M. Harris |
| 3:2022cv00403 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Shadane M. Harris waiver sent on 4/21/2022, answer due 6/20/2022. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Scott Semple waiver sent on 4/21/2022, answer due 6/20/2022. (Peterson, M) |
| REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Scott Semple and Shadane Harris on 4/21/2022. Waiver of Service due by 5/26/2022. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 9
Standing Order re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/19/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, all claims against defendants Erfe, Danby, and Ruiz are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The request for declaratory relief, the only claim asserted against the defendants in their official capacities, is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The case will proceed on the claims against defendants Semple, Harris, and Donohue-Gonzalez in their individual capacities only. The Court enters the following additional orders: (1)The Clerk shall contact the Department of Correction Office of Legal Affairs to ascertain a current service address for defendants Semple, Harris, and Donohue-Gonzalez, mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the Complaint and this Order to each defendant at that address within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the court on the status of the waiver request on the thirty-fifth day after mailing. If any defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall arrange for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on the defendant in his or her individual capacity and the defendant shall be required to pay the cost of such service. (2)The Clerk shall send the plaintiff a copy of this Order. (3)The Clerk shall send a courtesy copy of the Complaint and this Order to the Connecticut Attorney General and the Department of Correction Office of Legal Affairs. (4) The defendants shall file their response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the waiver forms are sent. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claim recited above. They also may include all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules. (5)Discovery, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, shall be completed within seven months (210 days) from the date of this order. Discovery requests need not be filed with the court. (6) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed within eight months (240 days) from the date of this order. (7)Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a nonmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection. (8)If the plaintiff changes his address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Court Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that he MUST notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the case. The plaintiff must give notice of a new address even if he is incarcerated. The plaintiff should write PLEASE NOTE MY NEW ADDRESS on the notice. It is not enough to just put the new address on a letter without indicating that it is a new address. If the plaintiff has more than one pending case, he should indicate all the case numbers in the notification of change of address. The plaintiff should also notify the defendants or the attorney for the defendants of his new address. (9)The plaintiff shall utilize the Prisoner Efiling Program when filing documents with the court. The plaintiff is advised that the Program may be used only to file documents with the court. As local court rules provide that discovery requests are not filed with the court, discovery requests must be served on defendants' counsel by regular mail. (10)The Clerk shall immediately enter the District of Connecticut Standing Order Re: Initial Discovery Disclosures concerning cases initiated by self-represented inmates and shall send a copy to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/14/2022. (Wong, Qing Wai)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/25/22. (Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/18/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/18/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/18/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Anthony Azukas. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS: MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Azukas. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS: COMPLAINT against Danby, Kristen Donohue-Gonzalez, Scott Erfe, Shadane M. Harris, Ricardo Ruiz, Scott Semple, filed by Anthony Azukas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (Peterson, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
