Staton v. Quiros al
| Terrell Staton and Staton |
| Caron Zylynette, Angel Quiros, Kardulos, Martinez, Touchette, Huff, Strachan, Officer Perez, Detective Gamble, Deputy Warden Dion, Grimaldi, CZM, Joseph, Caron, Perez, Gamble and Dion |
| 3:2022cv00857 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING #12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/7/2022. (Corriette, M.)
|
| Filing 14 Prisoner Authorization Form, by Staton. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 13 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, by Staton. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 12 Prisoner's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis In a Civil Rights Action, by Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Staton (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Introduce as Evidence by Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 9 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Relief from Restrictive Housing Injunction by Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Institute a Claim into the Pre-Existing Claim for Reprisal and Retaliation by Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Assistance of an Attorney by Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY re: Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Terrell Staton, a sentenced inmate at the Carl Robinson Correctional Institution, filed a civil action entitled Staton v. Commissioner of D.O.C. on October 21, 2021. Judge Bryant dismissed that case because, among other reasons, Mr. Staton lumped several unrelated and mis-joined claims into a single complaint. See Init. Review Order, Staton v. Commr, No. 21-cv-1302 (VLB), May 6, 2022. Judge Bryant did, however, allow Mr. Staton leave to refile his claims as separate actions. Evidently in response to that instruction, Mr. Staton has filed six new cases, which the Clerk of the Court docketed as Staton v. Lamont, No. 22-cv-854 (VLB), Staton v. Commr of Corrs., No. 22-cv-855 (VLB), Staton v. Quiros, No. 22-cv-856, Staton v. Quiros, 22-cv-857, Staton v. Shriver, No. 22-cv-860 (VAB), and Staton v. Gonzalez, No. 22-cv-861 (VLB). Mr. Staton did not pay the filing fee in any of the six cases.To proceed in forma pauperis in this District that is, to file a civil case without pre-paying the filing fee prisoners must file a completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a Civil Rights Action, along with a certified copy of their inmate trust account statement, showing balances and transactions for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). On July 26, 2022, the Court entered orders in four of the six cases, explaining that Mr. Statons in forma pauperis motions were insufficient. The Court now enters similar orders in the other two cases. In Staton v. Quiros 22-cv-00856 and Staton v. Quiros 22-cv-00857, Mr. Staton filed the identical in forma pauperis application, and accordingly the Court is unsure whether he truly intended to initiate two different actions and incur liability for two separate filing fees. Additionally, he did not file a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement in either case. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail two blank Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a Civil Rights Action forms to Mr. Staton at his address of record. Mr. Staton is directed to fill out a separate form for Staton v. Quiros 22-cv-00856 and Staton v. Quiros 22-cv-00857, writing the case number of each suit on the first page of each application. Mr. Staton must fill out each form completely, and in particular he must sign the funds withdrawal authorization in each application, so that the Court can be sure that he really means to authorize the withdrawal of $350 for each case according to the schedule set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915. Additionally, he must submit a trust account statement for the period January-June 2022 certified by an administrator of inmate trust accounts. Mr. Staton must comply with all of the above by August 25, 2022; if he does not, one or more of his cases may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 8/5/2022.(Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/8/2022.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/8/2022.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 7/8/2022.(Barry, L)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrell Staton. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CZM, Dion, Gamble, Grimaldi, Huff, Joseph, Kardulos, Martinez, Perez, Angel Quiros, Strachan, Touchette, Caron, filed by Terrell Staton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Barry, L) Modified on 7/14/2022 (Barry, L). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
