Cases 1 - 10 of 2,138
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Notarc Port Investment LLC, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
LANDBRIDGE PORT SERVICES HONG KONG LTD
Defendant:
NOTARC PORT INVESTMENT LLC, NOTARC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC, COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LLC and others
Kick et al v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Helene Kick, Paul Barbour, Greg Dion and others
Defendant:
County of Onondaga and Donald Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Dione Mobley
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dione Dante Mobley
Lay v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Defendant:
Stephens County, Ken Graham and Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell, II
Defendant:
Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Palmer v. Norfolk Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
James Dion Palmer
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff, Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10303
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
