Lexis v. Micalidzi et al
| Patrick Lexis |
| Micalidzi, Muniz, Giles, BOPP and Ned Lamont |
| 3:2022cv01142 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See attached Ruling and Order. Failure to tender the filing fee of $402.00 on or before November 25, 2022 will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 10/26/2022. (Chambers, Jillian)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Patrick Lexis (Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis - in other words, he has asked the Court's permission to begin a civil lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. The plaintiff is currently detained at the New Haven Correctional Center. (See Complaint, ECF No. 1, at 2.) When detained persons seek leave to begin a civil action in forma pauperis, the District of Connecticut requires that they complete an application form specific to the incarceration context. In this case, the plaintiff used the form for non-prisoner matters. Additionally, when detained persons seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. 1915 requires that they submit a certified copy of their inmate trust account statement. Here, the plaintiff did not do so.The Clerk of the Court is directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the "Prisoner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a Civil Rights Action" form. The plaintiff is directed to complete and return the form, along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, by October 7, 2022.The plaintiff is respectfully reminded that all of his entries on the application form must be true, correct, and complete. In his complaint, the plaintiff alleges that he owns a trucking company and recently earned $168,000 per year. In one of his other cases, Lexis v. Desena, 22-cv-1066, he alleged that he owns four acres of land in the Dominican Republic. None of these assets appear on his current in forma pauperis application. When the plaintiff re-files, his new application must list these assets or explain in detail why they should not be considered. All entries on his new in forma pauperis application must be true, correct, and complete. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/19/2022.(Corriette, M.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/9/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/9/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/9/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patrick Lexis. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOPP, Giles, Ned Lamont, Micalidzi, Muniz, filed by Patrick Lexis. (Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
