Alicea v. USA et al
Petitioner: Maria Mercedes Alicea
Respondent: United States Of America, State of Connecticut, Jane Doe, Katrina Camara, Francisco Antonio Cardona and USA
Case Number: 3:2023cv00170
Filed: February 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order finding as moot #6 Motion for Extension of Time in light of 10 Amended Order dismissing petition and denying a certificate of appealability, and in light of #7 Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/22/2023. (Stamegna, Ashley)
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER AMENDING 4 Order Dismissing Case. Petitioner purports to bring claims on behalf of her father, Mr. Octavio Alicea, arising out of similar facts and requesting similar relief to that in Alicea v. Ganim et al., No. 3:22-cv-01379 (D. Conn. filed Nov. 11, 2022). For the same reasons set forth in the Order to Show Cause, ECF. No. 9, and Order Dismissing Petition, ECF No. 14, in Alicea v. Ganim, No. 3:22-cv-01379, the instant petition is dismissed. See Ethridge v. Bell, 49 F.4th 674, 682 (2d Cir. 2022) ("[A] district court has the power to dismiss the petition on the merits without prior notice '[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.'" (quoting Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts)). If Petitioner wishes to challenge her father's conservatorship, there may be both statutory and common-law remedies available to her in the Connecticut State courts. Connecticut General Statutes Section 45a-705a provides that "[a]n individual subject to a guardianship or involuntary representation... may petition for and is entitled to the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus without having previously exhausted other available remedies." See Falvey v. Zurolo, 130 Conn. App. 243, 263 n.3 (2011) (Foti, J., dissenting in part) ("General Statutes 45a-705a specifically allows a conserved person to appeal the legality of guardianship pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus."). Likewise, Connecticut General Statutes Section 45a-186(b) provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by an order, denial or decree of a Probate Court may appeal therefrom to the Superior Court." See Marchentine v. Brittany Farms Health Ctr., Inc., 84 Conn. App. 486, 495 (2004) (finding that a child of a conserved person may, in certain circumstances, have standing to appeal a probate court's appointment of a conservator); see also Order to Show Cause at 2 n.1, Alicea v. Ganim, No. 3:22-cv-01379 (discussing state court remedies that may be available to Petitioner to challenge a conservatorship).The Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2), as no "reasonable jurists could debate whether... the petition should have been resolved in a different manner." Middleton v. Att'ys Gen. of States of N.Y., PA, 396 F.3d 207, 209 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478 (2000)).Petitioner is encouraged to visit the following link for information regarding the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Program: https://nhlegal.org/federalprose/. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/22/2023.(Gould, K.)
March 20, 2023 Filing 9 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #7 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Dinah Milton Kinney, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: none (Fanelle, N.)
March 20, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE Rule 16 Hearing Update by Maria Mercedes Alicea. (Fanelle, N.)
March 20, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 4 Order Dismissing Case, by Maria Mercedes Alicea. (Fanelle, N.)
March 20, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal by Maria Mercedes Alicea. (Fanelle, N.)
March 7, 2023 Filing 5 RESPONSE to # 4 Order Dismissing Case by Maria Mercedes Alicea. (Fanelle, N.)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Dismissing Petition. Petitioner purports to bring claims on behalf of her father, Mr. Octavio Alicea, arising out of similar facts and requesting similar relief to that in Alicea v. Ganim et al., No. 3:22-cv-01379 (D. Conn. filed Nov. 11, 2022). For the same reasons set forth in the Order to Show Cause, ECF. No. 9, and Order Dismissing Petition, ECF No. 14, in Alicea v. Ganim, No. 3:22-cv-01379, the instant petition is dismissed. See Ethridge v. Bell, 49 F.4th 674, 682 (2d Cir. 2022) ("[A] district court has the power to dismiss the petition on the merits without prior notice '[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.'" (quoting Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts)). If Petitioner wishes to challenge her father's conservatorship, there may be both statutory and common-law remedies available to her in the Connecticut State courts. Connecticut General Statutes Section 45a-705a provides that "[a]n individual subject to a guardianship or involuntary representation... may petition for and is entitled to the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus without having previously exhausted other available remedies." See Falvey v. Zurolo, 130 Conn. App. 243, 263 n.3 (2011) (Foti, J., dissenting in part) ("General Statutes 45a-705a specifically allows a conserved person to appeal the legality of guardianship pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus."). Likewise, Connecticut General Statutes Section 45a-186(b) provides that "[a]ny person aggrieved by an order, denial or decree of a Probate Court may appeal therefrom to the Superior Court." See Marchentine v. Brittany Farms Health Ctr., Inc., 84 Conn. App. 486, 495 (2004) (finding that a child of a conserved person may, in certain circumstances, have standing to appeal a probate court's appointment of a conservator); see also Order to Show Cause at 2 n.1, Alicea v. Ganim, No. 3:22-cv-01379 (discussing state court remedies that may be available to Petitioner to challenge a conservatorship). Petitioner is encouraged to visit the following link for information regarding the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Program: https://nhlegal.org/federalprose/.The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/13/2023. (Stamegna, Ashley)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/10/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/10/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
February 10, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Maria Mercedes Alicea. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Imbriani, Susan)
February 10, 2023 Filing fee received from Maria Alicea: $ 5.00, receipt number 373888 (Imbriani, Susan)
February 10, 2023 Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alicea v. USA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maria Mercedes Alicea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Connecticut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Katrina Camara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Francisco Antonio Cardona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?