Pizziconi v. Gray et al
| Andrea Pizziconi |
| Norman Gray, Sherman 695, LLC, Carlton Highsmith, Dmitry Kravtsoz, A Donald Janezic, Maria Gray, Tyler Floyd and Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01080 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER Returning Submission as Deficient: Answer returned to Dmitry Kravtsov. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 10/12/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 25 First Motion to Strike by Carlton Highsmith. (Federici, Louis) Modified on 9/26/2023 (Lewis, D). |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/31/2023 (Pesta, J.) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER granting #23 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties' time to file their Rule 26(f) Report is extended to October 31, 2023.Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 09/22/2023. (Haider, Syeda)
|
| Filing 23 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 31, 2023 To File Rule 26(f) Report by Andrea Pizziconi. (Steigman, Todd) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER. The Court received correspondence from a number of Defendants seeking time to secure counsel and respond to the Complaint. The Court's September 8, 2023 order extended the deadline for all defendants to respond to the Complaint until October 16, 2023. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 09/11/2023.(Haider, Syeda)
|
| Filing 21 Letter from Dmitry Kravtsov dated 9/6/2023 Re: Legal Representation. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 20 Letter from Norman Gray dated 9/6/2023 Re: Legal Representation. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall file their response to the Complaint on or before October 16, 2023. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/5/23. (Haider, Syeda)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 16, 2023 Respond to the Complaint by Carlton Highsmith. (Federici, Louis) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis M. Federici, Jr on behalf of Carlton Highsmith (Federici, Louis) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Sherman 695, LLC served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Dmitry Kravtsoz served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. A Donald Janezic served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Carlton Highsmith served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Norman Gray served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Maria Gray served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Tyler Floyd served on 8/16/2023, answer due 9/6/2023. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Tyler Floyd, Maria Gray, Norman Gray, Carlton Highsmith, A Donald Janezic, Dmitry Kravtsoz, Sherman 695, LLC, Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Todd D. Steigman* *Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau, LLC-HTFD* *402 Asylum Street* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Protective Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint, filed by Andrea Pizziconi, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Disclosure Statement filed by Andrea Pizziconi Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/14/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/14/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/13/2023 Discovery due by 2/13/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 3/19/2024 Signed by Clerk on 8/14/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Plaintiff's Disclosure Statement by Andrea Pizziconi. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/14/2023.(Perez, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tyler Floyd, Maria Gray, Norman Gray, Carlton Highsmith, A Donald Janezic, Dmitry Kravtsoz, Sherman 695, LLC, Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7447813.), filed by Andrea Pizziconi.(Steigman, Todd) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Tyler Floyd, Maria Gray, Norman Gray, Carlton Highsmith, A Donald Janezic, Dmitry Kravtsoz, Sherman 695, LLC, Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.. (Steigman, Todd) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
