Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pizziconi v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Andrea Pizziconi
Defendant:
Norman Gray, Sherman 695, LLC, Carlton Highsmith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
First Financial Bank v. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
First Financial Bank
Defendant:
Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. and Norman Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GRAY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv05197
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON
Petitioner:
NORMAN GRAY and NORMAN T. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gray #108144 v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
Norman Gray #108144
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services and William D. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. The Church of God International
as 1:2013cv21821
Plaintiff:
Teresa Richardson, Harold Richardson and John Stephens
Defendant:
The Church of God International , The Pineville Church of God , Wayne Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norman Gray v. Raymond Booker
as 12-2456
Petitioner - Appellant:
NORMAN GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden
Norman Gray v. Raymond Booker
as 12-2401
Petitioner - Appellant:
NORMAN GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden
Akalarian et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Clara Akalarian , Frances Burt , Vincent Ferla and others
Defendant:
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Aurora Loan Servicing, LLC , Bank of America Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Norman Gray v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-67466
Plaintiff:
Norman Gray
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc.
GRAY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67466
Plaintiff:
NORMAN GRAY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
