Armour v. Lamont
Shaquan L Armour |
Ned Lamont |
3:2023cv01606 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Michael P Shea |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ned Lamont* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Shaquan L Armour #379048* *GARNER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION* *50 Nunnawauk Rd, P.O. Box 5500* *Newtown, CT 06470*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 11 Standing Order re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Senior District Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/5/2024. (Peterson, M) |
USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP reviewed and sent to USM for service on defendant Ned Lamont. Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 2/25/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 10 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: As set forth in the attached order, (1) Plaintiff may proceed on a Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause claim for injunctive relief against Governor Lamont in his official capacity.Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause and Eighth Amendment claims are DISMISSED as not plausible. Plaintiff's official capacity claims for monetary damages and a declaratory judgment are DISMISSED without prejudice. (2) The Clerk shall prepare a summons form and send an official capacity service packet to the U.S. Marshal Service. The U.S. Marshal Service is directed to effect service of the complaint and this Order on Governor Lamont in his official capacity at the Office of the Attorney General, Mackenzie Hall, 165 Capitol Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order and to file a return of service within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.(3) The clerk shall send a courtesy copy of the complaint and this Order to the DOC Office of Legal Affairs and to the Office of the Attorney General.(4) The Defendant shall file a response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If the Defendant chooses to file an answer, Defendant shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claims recited above. The Defendant may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules.(5) Discovery, according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26-37, shall be completed by July 31, 2024. Discovery requests need not be filed with the Court.(6) The parties must comply with the District of Connecticut Standing Order Re: Initial Discovery Disclosures, which will be sent to both parties by the Court. The Order can also be found at http://ctd.uscourts.gov/administrative-standing-orders.(7) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed by August 30, 2024.(8) According to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a nonmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 2/2/2024. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 12/12/2023. (Corriette, M.) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 12/8/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 8 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/08/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 12/08/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/8/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Shaquan L Armour. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Shaquan L Armour. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaquan L Armour. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ned Lamont, filed by Shaquan L Armour. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Armour v. Lamont | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shaquan L Armour | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ned Lamont | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.