SHOES et al v. Biden et al
| SHOES and M. Alicea X. |
| Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute, Glen Sharkany, Prison Industries Owners of America, Ned Lamont, Rocky Hill Mayor, Rocky Hill Planning & Zonning & Planning Housing Until, Jane & John Does, New Britain Police, Middletown Police, New London Police and New Britain Superior Court |
| 3:2024cv00364 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 03/13/2024. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by M. Alicea X. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Biden, Jane & John Does, Garner Correctional Institute, Kamala Harris, Ned Lamont, Middletown Police, New Britain Police, New Britain Superior Court, New London Police, Prison Industries Owners of America, Rocky Hill Mayor, Rocky Hill Planning & Zonning & Planning Housing Until, SHOES, Glen Sharkany, filed by M. Alicea X. (Peterson, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
