Toliver et al v. Semple
| Toliver and Joseph Mincewicz |
| Semple |
| 3:2024cv00383 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Omar A Williams |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE re: Consent Form. The Clerk's Office received a signed consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction form. If the remaining parties wish to also consent, they shall file a separate signed consent form with the Clerk. Signed by Clerk on 4/2/2024. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 14 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Joseph Mincewicz (Peterson, M) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to District Judge Stefan R. Underhill for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 4/2/24. (Velez, F)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/1/2024. (Corriette, M.)
|
| Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Mincewicz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he files a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period preceding his complaint. In this case, the plaintiff did not do so. The plaintiff is therefore directed to file with the Clerk of the Court a copy of his inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from September 15, 2023, to March 15, 2024. If he does not do so by April 10, 2024, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/20/2024.(Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 8
Standing Order to Litigants Regarding Letters to the Court Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 03/15/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 03/15/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Chief Judge on 06/22/2016. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 03/15/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/15/2024.(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Joseph Mincewicz. (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Mincewicz. (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Semple, filed by Joseph Mincewicz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Gaskins, A) Modified on 3/19/2024 (Gaskins, A). |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
