Rivera v. Department of Corrections et al
| Miguel Rivera |
| Department of Corrections, Kevin T. McCrystal, UConn Health Care, Hector, Kathleen Kang, Richard G Williams, S. Whyte, Jane Doe and Magaly Alicea |
| 3:2024cv01462 |
| September 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/9/2024. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Miguel Rivera. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Miguel Rivera. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Magaly Alicea, Department of Corrections, Jane Doe, Hector, Kathleen Kang, Kevin T. McCrystal, UConn Health Care, S. Whyte, Richard G Williams, filed by Miguel Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mendez, D) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Velez, F) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
