Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03584
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02946
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murillo-Vazquez v. Blanche
as 26-5986
Petitioner:
HECTOR MURILLO-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
leyva v. Daikin Comfort Technologies Manufacturing, Inc.
as 4:2026cv07799
Plaintiff:
hector alejandro leyva
Defendant:
Daikin Comfort Technologies Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCount McClanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Ruiz Geldres v. Reilly et al
as 4:2026cv03281
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Hector Ruiz Geldres
Defendant:
Tyler Ray Reilly and JZ Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Washington v. Fang et al
as 3:2026cv00325
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. FANG et al
as 1:2026cv00939
Plaintiff:
LEO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
VANESSA FANG, JASMINE LECONT MCCLANAHAN, ROWAN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
