Gilberti v. Yale University et al
| Joseph D. Gilberti |
| Thomas Krug, Kimberly Carlton Bonner, Yale University, Lori Martin, United Nations, U.S. Congress, Mark Wolfe, Carmine Marceno, Lee Pallardy, Hunter Carroll, 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners, Tampa Central Command MacDill Air Force Base, James Dominguez, Dick Cheney, James Conrad, Port Authority of Connecticut, George W. Bush, National Sheriff's Association, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Senate, Maria Ruhl, Archdiocese of Hartford, Mark Cuban, Stephen Walker, Donna Marie Padar, Elon Musk, Ron DeSantis, Ashley Moody, Donald Trump, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Eric Adams, Pentagon, Greenberg Traurig Law, Notre Dame University, Sheila Sanghvi, Kamala Harris, Michelle Obama, Rick Scott, City Counsel of New Haven, Christopher Shaw, Thomas Widen, Harvard University, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Barrack Obama |
| 3:2024cv01708 |
| October 24, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Omar A Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #9 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Dinah Milton Kinney, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: None (Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 8 Order, by Joseph D. Gilberti. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, S) |
Filing 8
ORDER dismissing case. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), courts are required to dismiss any action that is frivolous or that fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After careful review of the complaint, the court cannot find a clear federal claim amongst the conclusory allegations therein. The facts asserted are difficult to follow, but Plaintiff appears to allege that there is some government conspiracy to withhold water from the public, and that this alleged conspiracy is being advanced by many current and former high-ranking government officials, including several presidents (whom he also accuses of kidnapping him and building a secret compound over the water sources in question). There is no detail included to support any of his accusations. He purports to bring suit under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, but it is unclear how any of the alleged facts implicate any provision therein. Further, it is not clear what role any of the Connecticut defendants played in the alleged conspiracy. Accordingly, the court can discern no cognizable claim in this case, and it must be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is asked, respectfully, to please close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/30/24. (Wagner, R)
|
|
Filing 7
Standing Order re: Letters. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.(Imbriani, S) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 10/24/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Complaint which has been assigned case number 24cv1708. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 11/23/2024 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 11/23/2024. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Eric Adams, Archdiocese of Hartford, Kimberly Carlton Bonner, George W. Bush, Hunter Carroll, Central Intelligence Agency, Dick Cheney, City Counsel of New Haven, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, James Conrad, Mark Cuban, Ron DeSantis, James Dominguez, Donna Marie Padar, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Greenberg Traurig Law, Kamala Harris, Harvard University, Thomas Krug, Carmine Marceno, Lori Martin, Ashley Moody, Elon Musk, National Sheriff's Association, Notre Dame University, Barrack Obama, Michelle Obama, Lee Pallardy, Pentagon, Port Authority of Connecticut, Maria Ruhl, Sheila Sanghvi, Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners, Rick Scott, Christopher Shaw, Stephen Walker, Tampa Central Command MacDill Air Force Base, Donald Trump, U.S. Congress, U.S. Senate, United Nations, Thomas Widen, Mark Wolfe, Yale University, filed by Joseph D. Gilberti. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Chartier, A.) Modified on 10/30/2024 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
