Jordan v. Lawrence et al
| Victor L. Jordan, Sr. |
| Lawrence, Jennifer Reis, Victoria Soley, Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, William Mulligan, John Doe, Fire Marshall and Nicole Sullivan |
| 3:2026cv00577 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/15/2026. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel and Litigants Regarding AI-Assisted Research: Attorneys and pro se litigants alike should exercise great caution in submitting any AI-generated language in filings before the Court. Use of AI without verification of the accuracy of the information it generates like any other shoddy research method from other sources or tools implicates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, the central purpose of which is to deter baseless filings in district court and thus to streamline the administration and procedure of the federal courts. Rule 11 applies fully to actions filed by pro se litigants.Therefore, all parties are on notice that the Court has a no-tolerance policy for any briefing (AI-assisted or not) that hallucinates legal propositions or otherwise severely misstates the law. Such filings will often result in sanctions absent reasonable excuse. See generally Willis v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n et al, No. 3:25-CV-516-BN, 2025 WL 1408897 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2025). Signed by Clerk on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including presiding over a jury or non-jury trial) and to order the entry of final judgment.(Gaskins, A) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Chief Judge on 6/22/2016.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/13/2026.(Gaskins, A)
|
| CASE ASSIGNMENT: District Judge Alvin W. Thompson assigned to the case. If the District Judge issues an Order of Referral to a Magistrate Judge for any matter other than settlement, the matter will be referred to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. (Langello, N) |
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(b), a disclosure statement required under Rule 7.1(a) must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/13/2026.(Limberti, L) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Victor L. Jordan, Sr. (Limberti, L) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Victor L. Jordan, Sr. (Limberti, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sharonda Carlos, John Doe, Fire Marshall, Lawrence, William Mulligan, Angel Quiros, Jennifer Reis, Victoria Soley, Nicole Sullivan, filed by Victor L. Jordan, Sr.(Limberti, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
