Miller v. Coning et al
| John E. Miller |
| Blake Warnick, Perry Phelps, McGinnis, Schaffer, Raymond Hannum and Christine Coning |
| 1:2011cv00377 |
| April 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Kent |
| J. Curtis Joyner |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 92 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -- granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/7/14. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
92
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- granting-in-part, denying-in-part 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer th an ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/17/2014. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 2/28/2014. (lih)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge J. Curtis Joyner on 9/28/2011. (lid)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Court has identified what appear to be cognizable claims against Defendants Christine Coning and Blake Warnick for labeling Plaintiff a snitch. All remaining claims are DISMISSED as frivolous and for failure to state a c laim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff is given leave to amend the sexual harassment and retaliation claims. Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. Should Plaintiff fail to file an amended complaint within the thirty (30) days, the case will proceed in the labeling as a snitch claim against Defendants Christine Coning and Blake Warnick. Plaintiff is placed on notice that an amended complaint that does not abide by the preceding Memorandum Opinion will be stricken.( Notice of Compliance deadline set for 8/12/2011.). Signed by Judge J. Curtis Joyner on 7/12/2011. (dlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
