Weber v. Phelps et al
Paul Edward Weber |
Perry Phelps and Beau Biden |
1:2013cv00283 |
February 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
Kent |
Sue L. Robinson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Supplement his Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment (D.I. 151 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's supplemented Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment (D.I. 150 ) is D ENIED for lack of jurisdiction because it is an unauthorized second or successive habeas request. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court also declines to issue a certificate of appealability, because Petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see United States v. Eyer, 113 F.3d 470 (3d Cir. 1997); 3d Cir. LAR 22.2 (2011). Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/21/2023. (mkr) |
Filing 144 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 2/8/2023. (twk) |
Filing 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 09/30/2022. (smg) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/12/2016. (klc) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 2/4/2016. (cna) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/30/14. (cla, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.