Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Williams v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv00343
Petitioner:
Moses J. Williams
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Delaware State Police, Nathaniel Mcqueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiMatteo v. Raymond et al
as 1:2015cv00066
Defendant:
Raymond, Mr. John Thomas Raymond, Mr. Kevin Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
DiMatteo and Deborah DiMatteo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purnell v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv01523
Petitioner:
Mark C. Purnell
Respondent:
David Pierce and Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv01513
Petitioner:
Christopher H. West
Respondent:
Pierce and Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Parkell v. Jack Markell, et al
as 14-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, Governor of Delaware, in his official and individual capacities, BEAU BIDEN, For Delaware, in his official and individual capacities, ROBERT COUPE, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carter v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv01062
Petitioner:
Jermaine L. Carter
Respondent:
David Pierce and Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TRICOME v. BARLIEB et al
as 2:2014cv04461
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant:
ETHAN BARLIEB, BEAU BIDEN, JOSEPH FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2014cv00770
Petitioner:
Malik X. Miller
Respondent:
State Of Delaware and Beau Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parkell v. Markell et al
as 1:2014cv00601
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Beau Biden, Robert Coupe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
