Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account v. CA, Inc. et al
| Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account |
| Christopher Lofgren, Jens Alder, Jeffrey Katz, Michael Gregoire, Raymond Bromark, Kay Koplovitz, Rohit Kapoor, CA, Inc., Jean Hobby and Richard Sulpizio |
| 1:2018cv01251 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account as to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Ernst, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel by Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account (Murray, Daniel) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (sar) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Jens Alder, Raymond Bromark, CA, Inc., Michael Gregoire, Jean Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher Lofgren, Richard Sulpizio - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2440902.) - filed by Jacob Scheiner Retirement Account. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(sar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
