Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lawrence Morelock v. Charmaine Yap, et al
as 23-15697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE MORELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARMAINE YAP, AIESHA DARNELL JONES, TAKISHA A. TERRELL and others
Lawrence Morelock v. Charmaine Yap, et al
as 23-15545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE MORELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARMAINE YAP, AIESHA DARNELL JONES, TAKISHA A. TERRELL and others
Lawrence Morelock v. Jeffrey Katz
as 22-2074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE SANBORN MORELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY KATZ, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CHARMAINE YAP, Clinical Psychologist, DUTY SOCIAL WORKER, Veteran Affairs Medical Center and others
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc v. Diamond Respiratory Care, Inc.
as 21-80131
Petitioner:
JEFFREY KATZ CHIROPRACTIC, INC.
Respondent:
DIAMOND RESPIRATORY CARE, INC.
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc. v. Lochness Medical Supplies Inc.
as 3:2021cv07096
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Lochness Medical Supplies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Floyd et al v. Wenig Holdings LLC
as 3:2021cv05548
Plaintiff:
Louis Floyd and Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Wenig Holdings LLC doing business as INSURANCESERVICES4U.com
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. Openmed Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05358
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Defendant:
Openmed Inc. and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Katz v. National Integrated Healthcare Group LLC
as 3:2021cv04379
Defendant:
National Integrated Healthcare Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc. v. Canadian Medical Dist., Inc.
as 3:2020cv08911
Defendant:
Canadian Medical Dist., Inc. doing business as Medykits.com
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Katz Chiropractic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
