Gilley v. CA, Inc. et al
| Kenneth Gilley |
| Jens Alder, Christopher Lofgren, Jeffrey Katz, Michael Gregoire, Raymond Bromark, Kay Koplovitz, Rohit Kapoor, CA, Inc., Jean Hobby and Richard Sulpizio |
| 1:2018cv01286 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kenneth Gilley as to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Ernst, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel by Kenneth Gilley (Murray, Daniel) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (rwc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS - filed with Jury Demand against Jens Alder, Raymond Bromark, CA, Inc., Michael Gregoire, Jean Hobby, Rohit Kapoor, Jeffrey Katz, Kay Koplovitz, Christopher Lofgren, Richard Sulpizio - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2444824.) - filed by Kenneth Gilley. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rwc) |
| No Summons Issued. (rwc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
