Post v. Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Joseph Post |
| Scott Garland, Odyssey Merger Sub Inc., John H. Johnson, David C. Stump, Dennis Fenton, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hollings C. Renton, H. Ward Wolff, Ted Love, Jeffrey Bird, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Laura Brege |
| 1:2020cv00715 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #3 . (fms) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joseph Post (Long, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| No Summons Issued. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 - filed with Jury Demand against Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jeffrey Bird, Laura Brege, Dennis Fenton, Scott Garland, John H. Johnson, Ted Love, Odyssey Merger Sub Inc., Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hollings C. Renton, David C. Stump - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADEDC-2959217.) - filed by Joseph Post. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.